By Lewis Roper, Senior Associate, Australian Business Lawyers & Advisors
As we enter the festive season, the usual hot topics for HR teams and leaders include managing parties and behaviours at out-of-hours events, as well as the “do’s and don’ts” of annual operations shutdowns and leave management.
However, in recent times, the rostering of employees to work on public holidays has become more of a legal minefield than just the usual operational headache of finding available workers. This is particularly so for the service sectors, where additional staffing is often needed to cover increased demand or trade, and in 24/7 shift-work settings with complex rostering processes.
Traditionally, many employers simply published a roster or included clauses in employment contracts that expected or required employees to work on public holidays. However, that conventional approach was turned on its head in 2023 by the Full Federal Court decision in CFMMEU v OS MCAP Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 51.
To comply with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act), employers must follow a more detailed process when requesting employees to work on public holidays.
The Decision
The Full Court’s decision considered a roster issued by OS MCAP (an in-house labour hire division of BHP) that required 85 employees to work Christmas Day and Boxing Day. The employees worked at a mine that operates 24 hours per day and 365 days per year.
The employees were engaged on a rotating roster of seven days on and seven days off. Several employees were rostered to work the Christmas and Boxing Day holidays. As the holidays approached, OS MCAP communicated to employees that if any had special circumstances, they could request to have the public holidays off. Of these requests, nine were granted and the remaining 85 employees worked the public holidays.
OS MCAP contended that implied in its rostering of the employees was an ability for the employees to refuse to work the day, should they have reasonable grounds.
However, the Full Court rejected this argument and held that there is a difference between requiring an employee to work a public holiday (as OS MCAP did by rostering its employees on Christmas Day and Boxing Day) and requesting employees to work a public holiday.
As no request was made, the Full Court held that the FW Act had been breached and referred the matter back to the primary judge to determine the appropriate remedy and penalty.
Relevant Provisions of the FW Act
Sections 114(1)-(3) of the FW Act provide:
Section 114(4) sets out several considerations to determine whether a request or refusal is reasonable, such as:
The Full Court’s Findings
The Full Court unsurprisingly found that s114(1) of the Fair Work Act entitles employees to be absent from work on a public holiday.
However, the Full Court noted that this entitlement can only be displaced where:
In either case, the Full Court emphasised that the working of a public holiday can only occur lawfully if the employer has first made a request for the holiday to be worked.
In this case (as is often the case in some service and shift-work environments), no request was made. OS MCAP simply rostered its employees to work the public holidays.
OS MCAP’s application for leave to appeal the Decision was rejected in late 2025 by the High Court, affirming the Full Federal Court’s decision that employers must first request employees work on public holidays.
Practical Tips for Employers this Festive Season
To ensure employers comply with the requirements of the Act, the following are some practical tips for employers to manage the process of requesting employees to work on public holidays
Things to keep in mind
The rostering of employees on public holidays is not as straightforward as it once seemed.
Employers are no longer able to simply publish a roster or expect that they can require an employee to work on a public holiday.
Rather, there must be a genuine request to work made, and the employee must be able to consider and exercise their right to accept or refuse the request. Employers can only require the employee to work if their refusal is unreasonable (having regard to the individual circumstances).
Ensuring that discussions happen early with the workforce is critical to allowing employers to comply with their legal obligations, as well as being able to plan operations effectively and efficiently.
If your business has questions regarding rostering, use your membership entitlements and contact the Workplace Advice Line to confirm what you need to do.